After learning this past week that the Department of Energy had secretly shipped a thousand pounds of weapons-grade plutonium to the Nevada National Security Site in Nye County before the state had filed a federal lawsuit in November seeking to block such shipments, Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak and the state’s entire Democratic delegation to D.C. flew into paroxysms of apoplexy, accusing the Trump administration of deception and dealing unfairly with the state.
Sisolak put out a statement declaring, “I am beyond outraged by this completely unacceptable deception from the U.S. Department of Energy. The Department led the State of Nevada to believe that they were engaging in good-faith negotiations with us regarding a potential shipment of weapons-grade plutonium, only to reveal that those negotiations were a sham all along. They lied to the State of Nevada, misled a federal court, and jeopardized the safety of Nevada’s families and environment.”
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto was similarly indignant, charging that the Energy Department had “negotiated in bad faith, hiding the timing of their shipment and refused to share crucial information with Members of Congress who had the security clearance to know.”
Sen. Jacky Rosen called the shipment “deceitful and unethical” and said “the lack of transparency from the Department of Energy is absolutely unacceptable.”
Rep. Susie Lee decried, “Nevada officials were deceived by sham ‘negotiations’ while the safety of millions was jeopardized, as was the environment and economy of dozens of states. Nevada is not the nation’s nuclear dumping ground. Period.”
Rep. Steven Horsford, whose district includes what most Nevadans still call the Test Site, also bemoaned, “Our state is not a dumping ground for the nation’s hazardous waste, and we have no intention of letting it become one.”
The Energy Department responded with its own statement, saying it was inaccurate to state that the Nevada delegation was not informed and the agency made efforts to ensure members of Congress and state officials representing the states involved were notified as early as August 2018.
The agency also said, “It is also inaccurate to characterize this material as ‘waste’. This material is essential for maintenance of the U.S. weapons stockpile, and is handled with the highest standards for safety and security. NNSA routinely ships this type of material between its sites as part of our national security missions and has done so safely and securely for decades.”
Of course the shipment was secret. No one wants to give potential terrorists an itinerary. As for deceiving the court, the shipment had already been sent when the state’s suit was filed and the court was told this past week when the information was declassified.
Speaking of deterrence, the ruckus over the plutonium shipment came mere days before Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the U.S. is pulling out of a nuclear arms control pact with Russia because of its ongoing and flagrant violations.
“When an agreement is so brazenly disregarded and our security is so openly threatened, we must respond,” Pompeo said. “Russia has jeopardized the United States’ security interests and we can no longer be restricted by the treaty while Russia shamelessly violates it.”
This means the U.S. will need to catch up with its potential adversaries, Russia and China, both of which have deployed long-range, nuclear-tipped missiles. That means maintaining and, yes, even adding to our nuclear arsenal.
The very reason the plutonium was shipped to Nevada was because a federal court had ordered it removed from the Savannah River facility in South Carolina because the government had failed to build a facility to convert the plutonium into nuclear reactor fuel. It is being stored here until it can be shipped to Los Alamos, N.M., where it can be processed for weapons with which to defend our country.
That is the role the test site has fulfilled for decades and needs to continue to do, despite the histrionics from Democratic politicians.
A version of this column appeared this week in many of the Battle Born Media newspapers — The Ely Times, the Mesquite Local News, the Mineral County Independent-News, the Eureka Sentinel and the Lincoln County Record — and the Elko Daily Free Press.
Lighten up Tom! At least we have a break from the constant whining from the left about the “rights” of illegal immigrants 🙂
Thomas I hope you’re sitting down because otherwise this spinning is likely to cause you to fall.
Heck I still remember a time when states rights was the call round these parts. Occasionally even “transparency”. And God knows I have heard before that the ole far away bureaucrats out in Washington wouldn’t tell the truth about nothing, even if they were somehow able to figure out what the truth is and now here you are, reciting what them guys are spreading around like it come straight outta the good book.
Times they are a changing…
States’ rights? Not when the feds own 87 percent of the state and no one talking about that.
Come on Thomas be serious.
You’ve been talking about states rights for years and the percentage of land the federal government owns in Nevada has always been about the same.
For the love of God man you’re defending the big bad government, about something they did which violates any pretense of states rights, and they did it with a total lack of transparency, and they lied about what they were doing, and are doing, and you’re gobbling it up like it’s a thanksgiving turkey.
[…] Source: Newspaper column: Nevada still has a role to play in nuclear deterrence « 4TH ST8 […]
Was the Energy Department’s response saying that it was inaccurate to state that the Nevada delegation was not informed and the agency made efforts to ensure members of Congress and state officials representing the states involved were notified as early as August 2018 true? If so, then it is the Nevada Delegates that are lying. I tend to view the statements of any governmental agency or politician with suspicion. Who is telling the truth? There in lies the quandary that the Public is constantly faced with. What is true and what is not true. In an era where the phrase, “Fake News” has become a mantra used by politicians on both the left and the right.
The fact that Nevada, unlike most of the other 50 States is comprised of 87% of its land mass which is claimed to be under Federal Jurisdiction is illustrative of the fact that Nevada enjoys less “State Rights” in terms of lands than other States. It is land that although within the boundaries of the State are not on the tax rolls or under their jurisdiction of the State o local governmental entities.