Democrats fail to block Puitt for head of EPA

Senate confirms Pruitt to head EPA. (AP pix)

Senate confirms Pruitt to head EPA. (AP pix)

The Senate this morning confirmed Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt on a near-party-line vote of 52-46 to head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

 

Democrats argued Pruitt should not head the agency while his state is suing the agency for rules created during the Obama administration and he is too close to the oil and natural gas industry, which is strong in his state.

 

Pruitt has locked horns with the EPA and other federal agencies several times in recent years, including challenging the Clean Power Plan (CPP), the Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) overreach, Endangered Species Act (ESA) decisions and even Obama’s failed effort to impose stricter overtime rules and costs on businesses and state and local governments.

Nevada’s own attorney general, Adam Laxalt, upon learning of the pending appointment immediately issued a statement praising the selection of Pruitt, who has joined with Nevada and other states in fighting a number of administration power grabs.

An example of Pruitt’s views on the role of the federal government and the rights of the citizens and local governance came when he filed suit over the EPA’s WOTUS rules.

“Respect for private property rights have allowed our nation to thrive, but with the recently finalized rule, farmers, ranchers, developers, industry, and individual property owners will now be subject to the unpredictable, unsound, and often byzantine regulatory regime of the EPA,” Pruitt told the press at the time. “I, and many other local, state and national leaders across the country, made clear to the EPA our concerns and opposition to redefining the ‘Waters of the U.S.’ However, the EPA’s brazen effort to stifle private property rights has left Oklahoma with few options to deter the harm that its rule will do.”

When Oklahoma joined the 29 states, including Nevada, suing the federal government over Obama’s Clean Power Plan, which was an attempt to shut down virtually all electricity generation with fossil fuels and replace it with more expensive renewables, Pruitt commented, “This administration continues to treat states as mere vessels of federal will, abusing and disrespecting the vertical separation of powers defined by our Constitution.”

 

The greens positively fulminated over statements like the ones made by Pruitt and the Alabama attorney general in an op-ed in National Review in May: “Healthy debate is the lifeblood of American democracy, and global warming has inspired one of the major policy debates of our time. That debate is far from settled. Scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind. That debate should be encouraged — in classrooms, public forums, and the halls of Congress. It should not be silenced with threats of prosecution. Dissent is not a crime.”

Nevada Republican Sen. Dean Heller voted to confirm, while Democrat Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto voted against confirmation.

Advertisements

3 comments on “Democrats fail to block Puitt for head of EPA

  1. deleted says:

    I await the day I see the applause on this page after a communist is confirmed for the position of Commerce Secretary, who proclaims that

    ““Healthy debate is the lifeblood of American democracy, and capitalism has inspired one of the major policy debates of our time. That debate is far from settled. Economists continue to disagree about the effects of capitalism and its impacts on society That debate should be encouraged — in classrooms, public forums, and the halls of Congress. It should not be silenced with threats of prosecution. Dissent is not a crime.”

  2. Dissent is not a crime. Neither is silliness.

  3. deleted says:

    Bill Gates for Commerce Secretary!

    “In a new interview with Quartz, Microsoft founder Bill Gates makes a rather stunning argument—that robots who replace human workers should incur taxes equivalent to that worker’s income taxes.
    “Right now, the human worker who does, say, $50,000 worth of work in a factory, that income is taxed . . . If a robot comes in to do the same thing, you’d think that we’d tax the robot at a similar level.”
    Get Data Sheet, Fortune’s technology newsletter.
    Gates argues that these taxes, paid by a robot’s owners or makers, would be used to help fund labor force retraining. Former factory workers, drivers, and cashiers would be transitioned to health services, education, or other fields where human workers will remain vital. Gates even suggests the policy would intentionally “slow down the speed of that adoption [of automation] somewhat,” giving more time to manage the broader transition.”

    http://fortune.com/2017/02/18/bill-gates-robot-taxes-automation/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s