Meanwhile, in a newsroom near you …

One of the advantages of growing older is that you can read the same book and watch the same movie several times and it’s new every time.

So, when I grabbed Miami Herald columnist Carl Hiaasen’s 2002 novel “Basket Case” off the shelf I figured I’d just read a couple of pages to refresh my memory. I’d recently given a grandson a copy of his book “Hoot,” which was written for a younger audience — I’d listened to it on audio while doing chores around the house and basically lollygagging — and wished to refresh my memory of his books for an older audience.

It is the story of a former investigative reporter demoted to the obituary page for tweaking the nose of the paper’s new owner in a public meeting. Firing him would have been bad PR and might’ve resulted in unseemly and tedious litigation, better to beat him down and humiliate him until he quit in frustration. The reporter is trying to unravel the mystery surrounding the death of former rocker Jimmy Stoma, the lead singer for band called the Slut Puppies. It takes place in South Florida, of course, and reminds me of those graveyard shifts for the afternoon newspaper atop One Herald Plaza overlooking Biscayne Bay and the mangroves.

I just finished reading or rereading it, whatever the case may be. There were several passages that I clearly recall reading somewhere sometime. Like the newspaper company executive spending millions in shareholder funds to move his company headquarters from the frozen north to San Diego so he could drive his fancy sports cars — or maybe that actually happened. Like the weekly diversity committee meetings — or maybe that actually happened. Like the double entendre in the headline on an obituary — or maybe … Hiaasen also calls the newspaper archive by its proper name: the morgue.

The O. Henryesque ending was a most satisfying way of wrapping things up, though it seems vaguely familiar.

But the opening of Chapter 22 is eerily evocative of many newsrooms today as newspapers change owners and slash their budgets to make the bottom line look more attractive for the next buyer. For my friends still drawing a meager newspaper paycheck, look around and see if you spot the people Hiaasen describes:

Good newspapers don’t die easily. After three years in the bone-cold grip of Race Maggad III, the Union-Register still shows sparks of fire. This, in  spite of being stripped and junk-heaped like a stolen car.

Only two types of journalists choose to stay at a paper that’s being gutted by Wall Street whorehoppers. One faction is comprised of editors and reporters whose skills are so marginal that they’re lucky to be employed, and they know it. Unencumbered by any sense of duty to the readers, they’re pleased to forgo the pursuit of actual news in order to cut expenses and score points with the suits. These fakers are easy to pick out in a bustling city newsroom — they’re at their best when arranging and attending pointless meetings, and at their skittish, indecisive worst under the heat of a looming deadline. Stylistically they strive for brevity and froth, shirking from stories that demand depth or deliberation, stories that might rattle a few cages and raise a little hell and ultimately change some poor citizen’s life for the better. This breed of editors and reporters is genetically unequipped to cope with the ranting phone call from the major, that wrath-of-God letter from the libel lawyer or that reproachful memo from the company bean counters. These are journalists who want peace and quiet and no surprises, thank you. They want their newsroom to be civil, smooth-humming and friendly as a bank lobby. They’re thrilled when the telephones don’t ring and their computers tell them they don’t have e-mail. The less there is to do, the slimmer the odds of them screwing up. And, like Race Maggad III, they dream of a day when the hard news is no longer allowed to interfere with putting out profitable newspapers.

The other journalists who remain at slow-strangling dailies such as the Union-Register are those too spiteful or stubborn to quit. Somehow their talent and resourcefulness continue to shine, no matter how desultory or beaten down they might appear. These are the canny, grind-it-out pros — Griffin is a good example — who give our deliquescing journal what pluck and dash it have left. They have no corporate ambitions, and hold a crusty, subversive loyalty to the notion that that newspapers exist to serve and inform, period.

Frankly, most of the latter have thrown in the towel and jumped ship. And isn’t “deliquescing” a most apropos term for the current state of many newspapers? It would make a good name for a rock band, as Dave Barry would say, the Deliquescing Ink-Stained Wretches.

In the morgue

In the morgue

 

 

 

15 comments on “Meanwhile, in a newsroom near you …

  1. Randa Todd says:

    I was fortunate to have ended my newspaper career when I did in 2003. Don’t think I could have mentally survived the changes.

  2. Vernon Clayson says:

    Maybe the last bastion for newspapers is the daily or weekly papers in small towns/cities where the readers are from the area the newspaper covers, where the subscribers enjoy reading about themselves, local events, local sports, local businesses and their ads, local police reports, local marriages, local politics, local obituaries. Local newspapers don’t have to push the agendas of presidents,governors, and mayors or be about the lifestyle of celebrities, that crap can be seen on TV, such newspapers can be about people that actually know one another.

  3. That still requires manpower and a certain level of aggressiveness and refusal to show favorites.

  4. Vernon Clayson says:

    I understand the owners, editors, and reporters, have to balance their reports, they can do that easier when they actually know the people they are writing for and about, too much aggression and the offended person might come in the door or meet the author on the street or at lunch. I’m speaking, well, writing, of newspeople in small town America, not the denizens of ivory towers that can pass unknown among the citizenry. On your comment,we just had months of aggression on big city media showing favoritism, they were found wrong, what good did agressiveness and favoritism do them? Maybe they should mellow out.

  5. Aggressiveness does not equal favoritism. I worked in small town journalism where everyone knew who I was and even in Las Vegas strangers recognized me on the street. I was personally accountable. That line about the mayor’s rant … been there, done that.

  6. deleted says:

    Thomas I wonder what impact you believe an owner of a business, as a newspaper is obviously, ought to have on what is published in his newspaper?

  7. He owns it. If he breaks it, it is on his head.

  8. deleted says:

    So no ethical responsibilities to the community?

  9. Of course, but there is no enforcement mechanism.

  10. Vernon Clayson says:

    There’s kind of an enforcement mechanism, subscriptions can be cancelled. Milliionaire/Billionaire owners won’t miss the pittance but the employees of the newspaper will find themselves less necessary. They all aren’t Woodward and Bernstein, their situation was unique, they had an easy target, Republican Richard Nixon. Who will come out with a devestating story saying “follow the money” on the newly rich Clintons or Obama, and when? Hell, no one can even use the word ethical on them.

  11. deleted says:

    Vernon if there’s anything to be learned by the fake news scandals proliferating out there now is that someone is always willing to pay.

    Even, and maybe especially, for lies. Yet another flaw of “free markets”.

  12. Steve says:

    Nope.
    Bad example at the least.

    Fake news sites rely on clickthrough revenue. Nothing is making people actually pay for access to the fake news, it comes free to the reader. The trouble is with the automated ad software, there is no checking to ensure the links are to reputable sites, only that those sites are paying for the ads placed on websites. Recently many of those fake ads would take people to fake antivirus sites selling fake antivirus software while stealing personal identification and financial information.
    The literal millions of clickthrough’s generated a totally untraceable revenue stream as many of the sites placing the ads were generated only for that purpose and later deleted from the server only to be replaced with another fake site doing the same thing all over.

    You should never trust anything offered for free. If there is no financial gain for the offer, then it is very likely too good to be true.

    Funniest thing, many of the fake sites are coming out of the old Iron Curtain nations. Thieves learn fast, specially when they were raised under a system that required them to be crooks just to obtain the basic necessities of life.

  13. Steve says:

    It’s true. Democrats were actively lying and setting up fake news sites trying to bait the alt-right.
    Probably backfired.

  14. Rincon says:

    Democrats have fake news sites? Does this mean you think Republicans don’t or did you just forget to mention them?

  15. Rincon says:

    BTW, don’t disparage these business people from Iron Curtain countries. They’re just being quick studies on unfettered capitalism. Let the buyer beware!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s