Watchdog is muzzled

For decades the Las Vegas newspaper aggressively fought for transparency in state and local government affairs, pressing for stronger public records and open meetings laws and urging vigorous enforcement of those laws — even going to court itself when necessary on behalf of the public’s right to know how its money is being spent and its affairs are being conducted.

Casino executive Sheldon Adelson, who bought the paper less than a year ago, has muzzled the watchdog.

Coiled in Senate Bill 1, just passed in a special session of the Nevada Legislature to fund $750 million for Adelson’s bid to build a domed NFL stadium, is a rattlesnake, and the Las Vegas newspaper has taken no notice of its rattle.

The bill reads in part:

Sec. 30. 1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3 and NRS 239.0115, the Stadium Authority shall keep confidential any record or other document provided to the Stadium Authority by a developer partner, the National Football League team or the Stadium Events Company, which is in the possession of the Stadium Authority, if the person providing the information:

(a) Submits a request in writing that the record or other document be kept confidential by the Stadium Authority; and

(b) Demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Stadium Authority that the record or other document contains proprietary or confidential information.

2. If the Stadium Authority determines that a record or other document contains proprietary or confidential information, the Chair of the Board of Directors shall attach to the file containing the record or document:

(a) A certificate signed by him or her stating that a request for confidentiality was made by the requesting entity and the date of the request;

(b) A copy of the written request submitted by the requesting entity;

(c) The documentation to support the request submitted by the requesting entity; and

(d) A copy of the decision of the Stadium Authority determining that the record or other document contains proprietary or confidential information.

3. Records and documents that are confidential pursuant to this section:

(a) Are proprietary or confidential information of the requesting entity;

(b) Are not a public record; and

(c) Must not be disclosed to any person who is not an officer or employee of the Stadium Authority unless the requesting entity consents to the disclosure.

So, not only do all the profits accrued by the “public” stadium go solely to the private investors, but the taxpayers will never know just how much that is — or much of anything else for that matter.

9 comments on “Watchdog is muzzled

  1. Bruce Feher says:

    Ah, Nevada….bought and paid for!

  2. Steve says:

    Sheldon Adeleson has been good for the Las Vegas Sun.

  3. John L. Smith says:

    Nice job. I will get this out. >

  4. A.D. Hopkins says:

    Depressing but not unexpected.

  5. Bill says:

    I doubt that few of the Legislators read the bill carefully or even if they had that they would have understood the potential ramifications of that language. Few media would have understood the import and even fewer would have pointed it out. One of the problems of a special session is that the time line is so short. The Governor calls for a special session to address a particular problem, the legislature meets and in a few days it is a done deal. No real examination. But what the hell, a lot of legislators and a whole lot of the media don’t read the stuff before the fact even in a regular session.

  6. Update: Case dismissed! On Monday, October 17, District Judge John Grinsteiner rejected the “riot” charge that had been leveled against Amy Goodman …

    At least they also dismissed the case against Peter Santilli.

  7. deleted says:

    Some decent judges left I guess.

  8. Steve says:

    Amy Goodman is not the only one. (Patrick is slipping)
    If opinion journalists (columnists) are actually documenting the events they are writing about and not actively participating in the protest, then they are one hundred percent protected by the First Amendment.
    So, what about Deia Schlosberg, Lindsey Grayzel and Carl Davis? Were they documenting? OR were they actively protesting?

    http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/10/18/its-outrageous-im-facing-45-years-prison-filming-climate-protest

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s