Editorial: Lawmakers should reject public funding for football stadium

Stadium rendering via RJ

Billionaire casino and newspaper owner Sheldon Adelson is threatening to take his football and go home if Nevada legislators don’t raise room taxes in Clark County to provide $750 million toward construction costs of his proposed $1.9 billion domed football stadium that would become home to the Las Vegas Raiders and UNLV football teams.

To which we reply: Don’t forget your ball on the way out, Sheldon.

At a meeting of the Southern Nevada Tourism Infrastructure Committee this past week, Las Vegas Sands President Rob Goldstein, who indicated he was speaking on behalf of Sands owner Adelson, reportedly said, “Not to be difficult, but we’re not negotiable. If we can’t get 750, we respectfully thank you but we’re going to move on.”

According to press accounts of the meeting, various stadium supporters went out of their way to emphasize that the tax would be paid by tourists and not residents and the room tax would increase by just less than 1 percent, costing most tourists about a dollar a night.

Yes, a dollar a night 750 million times.

Money is fungible. That $750 million could be spent on a stadium or something else. According to a 2014 economic impact study for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, $140 million of Clark County’s room tax went into the statewide distributive school account, $130 million for parks, recreation and transportation and nearly $80 million to Clark County schools. Fully 39 percent of the room tax revenues went to fund education.

By comparison, $750 million is about half the tax hike approved by the 2015 Legislature — the largest in history.

Some casino executives have warned that raising the room tax could make Las Vegas less competitive in the lucrative convention business. The Clark County room tax rate currently tops out at 12 percent, while top competitor Orlando’s rate is 12.5 percent. There are already plans to increase the Clark County rate by half a percent to pay for a convention center expansion. Adding another point to that makes the rate nearly 13.5 percent, and might result in reduced visitor volume and thus less revenue. Visitors have budgets, and money spent on rooms is not spent on gambling, dining and merchandise — all of which are taxed by the state.

Strangely enough, stadium backers are now making the pitch that the tax money would not be supporting a privately owned stadium but a publicly owned stadium.

“There’s been a lot of conversation on why are we giving money to billionaires,” Steve Hill, chair of the infrastructure committee and head of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development, was quoted as saying. “The public is not making a contribution to a privately owned stadium.”

Great, the public will be on the hook for capitalizing the project and will take the hit if the stadium operations lose money. What can possibly go wrong?

Even Adelson admitted in an interview with his own paper Sunday that stadiums don’t make a lot of money: “The amount of money that can be made by this stadium is so small that we [Las Vegas Sands], as the largest gaming operator in the world, make that same amount of money in one or two days, maybe three sometimes.”

The stadium proponents want the governor to call a special session of the Legislature in September to pass the tax hike and create a public stadium board of directors, though some lawmakers reportedly want to wait until after the November election.

Not that anyone is trying to sway them, mind you, unless you find nefarious motives in a leaked email from an editor to reporters covering legislative races for the Adelson owned Las Vegas Review-Journal. The email, posted online by political blogger Jon Ralston, reportedly instructs reporters to ask candidates whether they support using room tax money to build a stadium, but also pointedly states that this information will not be published. Then why ask, pray tell? To determine to whom contribution checks should go?

Also, football teams are quite fickle. The Raiders moved to Los Angeles in 1982 and back to Oakland in 1995. Oakland is still paying for the stadium renovations completed to lure the Raiders back. Now the team owners are courting Las Vegas for a new home, at least until the paint on a new stadium begins to fade and before the mortgage is paid off.

“NFL stadiums do not generate significant local economic growth, and the incremental tax revenue is not sufficient to cover any significant financial contribution by the city,” says Roger Noll, an economics professor at Stanford University.

Public funding for football stadiums is a notoriously bad economic investment — creating part-time, minimum wage jobs that are more of a drain on a state than a boost.

Nevada lawmakers should take a pass on this terrible sports bet.

A version of this editorial appeared this week in some of the Battle Born Media newspapers — The Ely Times, the Mesquite Local News, the Mineral County Independent-News, the Eureka Sentinel,  Sparks Tribune and the Lincoln County Record.

Update: An RJ editor now says the paper always intended to publish the answers by lawmakers as to whether they support public money for a stadium.

9 comments on “Editorial: Lawmakers should reject public funding for football stadium

  1. Bruce Feher says:

    The average cost of a NFL Ticket is $62.00! Not the best seats, of course. Then there is the cost of parking and Heaven forbid, if you want a drink and something to eat then the price goes up even more! What if you wanted to bring your family?
    Now the Nevada elites want to stick our much needed tourists with a $750 Million room tax to help fund this cash cow! Sooner or later our visitors will start going to other destinations and where will that leave us?
    Don’t let the special interests get away with making tourists pay for their stadium that will only make the rich richer. NO PUBLIC FUNDING! Please sign our petition.
    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/900/946/876/fund-it-yourselves/?taf_id=28472301&cid=fb_na#bbfb=330123216

  2. Reziac says:

    Waitaminnut. Raiders as in Oakland Raiders? If they’re not profitable in Oakland, right in the most profligate part of the country, where locals spend money like water — what makes anyone think they’d be profitable in Las Vegas, where all you’ve got is the captive tourist audience?

  3. John L. Smith says:

    Good one. “Money is fungible,” you may recall, is one of Sheldon’s favorite lines. It would sting him to read it in this context.

    Thanks again for the great meal and evening. Coffee soon? >

  4. Patrick says:

    Any reason why, after the issues Sheldon had in Macau with the mob, that an investigation isn’t being done by the gaming control board into his fitness to retain his license?

    Seems like the AG ought to have done this already.

  5. Maybe the AG has. Previous investigations of Adelson did not come out until the records were about to be used as defense in a defamation case brought by Adelson.

  6. JOHN EDWARDS says:

    I like football, but I agree. Nevada has a lot needs more important than enriching the stadium bankers,
    The Strip seems to think it’s entitled to use the room tax like their own piggy bank. The tax revenues belong to the citizens — not to political insiders.
    The stadium backers want to use “other people’s money” to make money. It’s also call corporate welfare.

  7. iShrug says:

    Rather than the increased room tax paying for the stadium, wouldn’t the city/county actually be issuing bonds — and be stuck with paying for service on the $750 million for 30 years? In half that time, any pro team might well have left. This is assuming a team ends up coming here at all. The stadium will be antiquated before the 30 years of debt have been paid.

  8. I could have sworn that I heard a radio news blip this past week where spokesman Rob Goldstein said that Adelson and the Sands Corp. would back all of the costs of the new stadium if need be and asked for a meeting with the Governor to get the ball rolling and get this all approved. He was quoted as saying I don’t want the public thinking that billionaires need or are trying to take their tax money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s