Newspaper column: Nevada is killing jobs it spent tax money to attract (Updated)

Sometimes the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.

Two years ago the Governor’s Office of Economic Development doled out $1.2 million to entice rooftop solar panel installer SolarCity to open an office in Nevada and create jobs.

This past week the governor-appointed Public Utilities Commission became the Governor’s Office of Economic Dismemberment, issuing rules that make SolarCity’s business model no longer viable in Nevada. The next day the company announced it is shutting down most operations and laying off workers.

“The people of Nevada have consistently chosen solar, but yesterday their state government decided to end customer choice, damage the state’s economy, and jeopardize thousands of jobs,” SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive said in a press release. “The PUC has protected NV Energy’s monopoly, and everyone else will lose. We have no alternative but to cease Nevada sales and installations, but we will fight this flawed decision on behalf of our Nevada customers and employees.”

SolarCity is run by Elon Musk, whose Tesla Motors was given a $1.3 billion package of tax credits and abatements to build an electric car battery plant near Sparks. All in the name of creating jobs.

Solar panels being installed. (R-J photo)

The three-member panel ordered NV Energy to start charging so-called net metering customers with solar panels an additional connection charge and to slash the credit for power uploaded to the grid from the retail rate of more than 11 cents per kilowatt-hour to the wholesale rate of about 5 cents — stretching out for years the length of time it will take for current solar panels to provide a return on investment and possibly making it impossible for new installations to ever pencil out. NV Energy must now provide the actual rates by Jan. 1.

According to Investor’s Business Daily (IBD), net metering is required in 44 states but is a thorn in the side of utility companies, which can buy renewable energy cheaper from utility-scale solar plants instead of giving credit for rooftop solar at the same rate as retail. Solar panel owners contend they are not “selling” power, but are banking it, uploading power to the grid when the sun shines and withdrawing power when the sun goes down.

The utility companies claim they make hundreds of dollars less each year providing service to net metering customers, and that is somehow unfair to other ratepayers.

Oddly, state law requires 25 percent of the state’s electricity to come from renewable sources by the year 2025, and the state has for years required NV Energy to provide subsidies to cover the cost of installing rooftop solar panels, a cost passed on in the form of higher power bills to all ratepayers.

Businesses that install rooftop panels had warned that this decision could cost the state 6,000 jobs. SolarCity itself has 2,000 employees here, according to a Nov. 30 press release announcing a new training center.

Bryan Miller, a vice president of solar panel installer Sunrun and head of The Alliance for Solar Choice (TASC), told IBD there will be litigation challenging the PUC decision because state law requires Nevada to encourage renewable energy investment.

“We believe the (Nevada Public Utilities Commission), appointed by Governor Sandoval, has done the exact opposite today,” he said. “In a similar situation in Wisconsin, the commission acted without evidence and attempted to eliminate the solar industry. TASC sued and TASC won, and TASC expects to do the same here.”

There are an estimated 17,000 net metering customers in Nevada.

SolarCity’s Rive said of those customers, “Most disturbing is the PUC’s decision to retroactively sabotage existing solar customers’ investments by changing the rules on them. The Nevada government encouraged these people to go solar with financial incentives and pro-solar policies, and now the same government is punishing them for their decision with new costs they couldn’t have foreseen. These actions are certainly unethical, unprecedented, and possibly unlawful.” Actually, NV Energy did not initially propose to make the changes retroactive. That came from the PUC staff.

Net metering customer Louise Helton told the Las Vegas newspaper the rate change will cost her more than $600 a year and will add more than $12,000 to the cost of her solar system over the useful life of the system.

This is what happens when the state picks winners and losers and keeps changing the rulebook.

NV Energy is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Energy, which cut nearly 10 percent of its Nevada jobs after acquiring the company in 2013.

It is all about jobs, right?

(Disclosure: This writer is a net metering customer of NV Energy.)

A version of this column appears this week in the Battle Born Media newspapers — The Ely Times, the Mesquite Local News, the Mineral County Independent-News, the Eureka Sentinel, the Lincoln County Record and the Sparks Tribune — and the Elko Daily Free Press.

Update: On Wednesday the PUC posted a 104-page filing that outlines the new net metering tariffs it plans to impose. It immediately raises the connection fee for the residential and small business owners of solar panels from $12.75 to $17.90 today and to $38.51 in 2020.

It immediately cuts the credit for each kWh of power uploaded to the grid from 11 cents to 9 cents and slashes it to 2.6 cents in 2020, half the daily levelized rate NV Energy says it pays for wholesale power now. And never mind that the power is uploaded in the heat of the day when wholesale power costs many times more.

A back of the napkin calculation suggests that new rates will add about $60 to $70 to a net metering bill for a 5-kilowatt array by 2020, wiping out more than two-thirds of the monthly savings or more.

By 2020 some owners of older solar panel arrays, which lose generating power over time, might have a liability instead of an asset on their hands, costing more to haul the panels to the dump than they save on power bills.

Yes, the standard net metering contract contains this clause: “Utility’s distribution tariffs may be amended by the PUCN at any time.” Who could have anticipated this kind of bait and switch when the powers that be were all preaching green energy all the time to save the planet?

tarrif

Advertisements

9 comments on “Newspaper column: Nevada is killing jobs it spent tax money to attract (Updated)

  1. Bruce Kester says:

    The remarks left by a WSJ commenter Dallas Weaver sum up a notion I have been arguing during this whole debacle.

    “There seems to be a huge change in utilities accounting over the years. Decades ago, when they owned the power generation facilities, the cost of retail electricity was primarily the cost of generation plus a small amount for transmission and distribution (the grid cost).

    With no change in the grid, the grid accounting cost magically increased, when the power sources became more diverse, threatening the utilities total sales and bureaucratic size. The advent of household solar and LED lighting with more efficient AC’s threatens their gross energy sales per customer.” ( http://www.wsj.com/articles/nevadas-solar-flare-1451346423 )

    3% of their customer base is buying less….just less… of their energy and the wolf is at the door of their monopoly? What we have here is a failure to evolve a’ la the early days of the telecom industry.

    It’s interesting that one NVE attempt to evolve is to promote and sign contracts for the Tonopah solar farm buying energy for $.13/KWH. They will have transmission loss and infrastructure costs to get that energy here. With the PUC’s windfall, NVE will only have to credit me the equivalent of $.05/KWH for energy i send to my next door neighbor.

  2. Make that 2.6 cents, sir.

  3. Steve says:

    This sounds so familiar….
    http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/the-bloom-energy-rip-off/

    I liked the promise this tech seemed to make at the beginning, it is turning out to be much less.
    And they are not seeking to install residential at all, they are going after the big money…what a surprise.
    The little guys get the screws while the big boys get the gold.

    Contrary to what may seem my opinion, I am not happy with our PUC and NV Energy bating, then switching what was sold to existing customers.
    I am saying something like this was inevitable. As more people found ways to use less, the providers of energy will find ways to charge more.
    Did anyone really think they were going to simply role over and play dead?

    Re wire your systems to take major devices off the grid and use the grid as back up for those devices, it’s the only way to beat them at their games. But be aware, they will continually find ways to make everyone pay more as we all use less.
    Moreover, as people use less, those who do not will pay even more.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I’m still trying to figure out why the monthly service charge increased, considering that meter readers no longer read meters. Never mind, we have to cough up to pay for those so called smart meters. What a scam. It’s all a huge scam. None of these renewables are clean, green, or sustainable. Where do old used solar panels go when they die?

  5. […] are both talking about the Public Utilities Commission decision to slash the credit for electricity uploaded to the grid by solar panels and triple the connection for those with solar […]

  6. […] state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) recently changed the rules for billing of residential and small businesses electricity customers who installed solar panels. […]

  7. […] The state offered one such company, SolarCity, $1.2 million in taxpayer money to open in Nevada and now it is leaving, along with 550 jobs so […]

  8. […] after drawing $400,000 of its allocated $1.2 million, announced just before Christmas that it is ceasing new operations in Nevada and laying off 550 employees after the state Public Utilities Commission drastically […]

  9. […] the contract does say: “Utility’s distribution tariffs may be amended by the PUCN at any […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s