No one could’ve seen this power play coming, could they?

Who could have possibly seen this coming?

NV Energy, the monopoly power company that serves most of Nevada, is proposing to end a contract to buy electricity from an independent generating company that provides peak power with gas-fired plants and instead build its own gas-fired plant.

NV Energy is allowed to pass through costs of power it purchases, but it gets a rate of return on equity, the plants and power lines it owns, of about 10 percent.

Mark Garrett, an energy consultant working with MGM Resorts, says of the proposal, “It should be looking for ways to lower rates, not raise them.” He estimates the new plant could increase ratepayer costs $70 million per year.

NV Energy gas-fired power plant.

Back in 2013 when the Legislature passed a bill to close all NV Energy coal-fired plants, 4TH ST8 quoted Dan Jacobsen of the attorney general’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, which represents ratepayer interests at the Public Utilities Commission, as saying, “In addition to replacing about 1,000 megawatts of coal capacity, the bill also would be replacing a very large amount of power purchase agreements right now that ratepayers don’t have to provide a return on.”

Precisely what is happening now.

“There are power purchase agreements that are pretty helpful in covering peak load but not having to be purchased at times when there isn’t a peak load,” Jacobsen noted at the time. “That’s a pretty good mix at times for Nevada with extreme heat in the summer that doesn’t last more than about three months.”

Then Jacobsen addressed the most glaring flaw in the bill: Its decades-long, Soviet-style central planning. “I hope you have an appreciation for the difficult, long-range  decision you are being asked to make in this bill,” Jacobsen said. “Step back and think about it for a minute, you’re being asked right now, based on information you have right now, to make a decision that, for example, in the year 2025 the right thing to do is to build a 500-megawatt natural gas plant.

“That’s 12 years from now. Technology can change a lot in 12 years. The demand projection can change a lot. The wholesale market can change a lot. Efficiency options can change a lot. But this bill says to you: Please mandate the right thing to do 12 years from now is to build a 500-megawatt natural gas plant. That’s quite a challenge for you as a policy makers to make.”


The previous time the power company was given carte blanche to build power plants and begin to recover costs immediately, even before any review by state regulators, was in the 1980s. That was because the company needed new power supplies — from coal-fired plants.

8 comments on “No one could’ve seen this power play coming, could they?

  1. I think Uncle Warren saw it coming…it’s all about his bottom line.

  2. Vernon Clayson says:

    How does building a natural gas power plant in 12 years match up with solar panels wearing out in about the same period of time? BS like waves to the shore.

  3. gintuition says:

    Is that why they closed the Consumer Protections Bureau?

  4. I think that was Consumer Affairs.

  5. iShrug says:

    I have found Dan Jacobsen to be an extremely thoughtful and conscientious public servant. He takes the interests of consumers seriously, and is very approachable. His salary is money well spent, in my opinion.

  6. Kilgore Trout says:

    Mr. Jacobsen is apparently no longer employed by the Attorney General’s office. Mr. Mitchell, it might be worth investigating whether his departure is in any way related to the Bureau of Consumer Protection’s recent flip-flop on its positions regarding renewable energy.

  7. Jacobsen is gone but no reason given.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s