For this younger generation concept, an older generation has the vocabulary

Review-Journal columnist Steven Kalas, a behavioral health consultant and counselor, every Monday wraps his hands and head around some human foible or the other in his column “Human Matters.”

Today he recounts a conversation — nay, lecture — with/from an unnamed condescending college student about human sexuality.

Steven Kalas

“It turns out that sex refers to the respective genitals attached to you at birth. These genitals are not your fault. No one, in fact, is to blame. Biology just does this randomly. It’s a genital lottery of sorts,” writes Kalas.

“But gender, on the other hand, is assigned. I was, apparently, assigned the identity of male. My sisters, assigned the identity of female.”

Kalas explains for us folks unexposed to such hair-splitting language that these are words the student has heard in class and read in textbooks.

But many of us have been exposed to the concept of which Kalas relates. It is called newspeak and is explained in George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four.” The words were pared down to the fewest possible ones in order to control the underlying reasoning. Thus, bad becomes ungood and warm becomes uncold.

Kalas says the student calls himself/herself/itself “nonbinary.” Perhaps, unsexed or ungendered are synonyms?

“I agree that some gender biases are unjust,” Kalas states. “Other gender biases, however, shape meaning. And human beings need meaning the way they need oxygen.”

Haven’t they sucked all the oxygen out of college classrooms?

After explaining to said student in somewhat clinical terms why sex and gender can never be insignificant or irrelevant, Kalas concludes with these astute observations:

“Is there such a thing as psychosexual immaturity? Is there such a thing as sexual psychopathology? Is there such a thing as healthy psychosexuality? These are not moral questions; these are clinical questions. And it’s getting harder and harder to ask them without being charged with injustice and/or ignorance, quid pro quo. But I am not dissuaded.

“My young friend’s eyes are glazed. I should stop.

“I should be patient with him. It’s not his fault he was born during a time that going to college included getting assigned The Right Thoughts.”

Of course, anything else would be a thoughtcrime and the campus thought police would be in hot pursuit.

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?” Orwell wrote in “Nineteen Eighty-Four.” “In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.”

Orwell explained this in his essay “Politics and the English Language,” saying, “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better. The debased language that I have been discussing is in some ways very convenient.”

Or perhaps we’ve just fallen through the looking glass:

‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.’

‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.’

(BTW, the online sig for Kalas’ column hasn’t been updated in months and still says the column appears on Sundays in the Living section, which has been called the Life section for quite some time.)

10 comments on “For this younger generation concept, an older generation has the vocabulary

  1. nyp says:

    I am not sure what is “Orwellian” about the idea that one’s “sex” is biologically determined by how the chromosomes happened to have been arranged during the moment of fertilization, but that one’s “gender” is much more a matter of social convention.

  2. Steve says:

    People are not amoeba’s

  3. The term “psychobabble” comes to mind…from the Urban Dictionary: “Speech that is heavy in post-structuralist jargon that is heavily based on experience and emotion instead of well-known science.” Or alternatively defined…”writing or talk using jargon from psychiatry or psychotherapy without particular accuracy or relevance.”

  4. Bruce Feher says:

    Thank you Tom for reading this BS so I don’t have to!

  5. nyp says:

    The responses here make me even more convinced that the student was correct and that there was nothing “Orwellian” about her statement.

  6. Steve says:

    “her” statement?

    Hmm, nothing wrong at all.

  7. Winston Smith says:

    I see DARPA is back with the latest fascist/globalist mindfuck. It certainly keeps up with the current trends in destroying our society from the inside.

  8. Athos says:

    Meanwhile, another 50,000 illegals cross the border to feast on the welfare tit.

  9. nyp says:

    “Lowest-Cost Exchange Premiums Remain Competitive in 2016; Consumers may be able to keep increases small by selecting a low-cost silver option: ‘While recent public attention has focused on a subset of plans that filed for premium increases of 10 percent or more, these data reveal that most plans are proposing more modest increases,’ said Caroline Pearson, senior vice president at Avalere. ‘Notably, final premiums could be even lower than those proposed.'”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s