Controller offers plan to spend more without raising taxes … sort of

While Gov. Brian Sandoval’s revised tax hiking plan, hatched behind closed doors, warranted banner play in the Las Vegas newspaper today, Controller Ron Knecht’s public presentation of an alternative plan that spends nearly as much but raises no taxes got less than short shrift in the news coverage. It got no shrift. The only mention came in a liberal column pooh-poohing it as a waste of time.

Sandoval’s plan basically shifts his margin tax-lite business license fee to a margin tax-lite “commerce” tax. Either way it will require a two-thirds vote in both houses of the Legislature.

Knecht’s plan does not — although it takes a bit of sleight of hand to avoid the tax hike label.

During a couple hours in front of a skeptical Assembly taxation committee, Knecht outlined his proposal which would spend $6.9 billion instead of the $7.3 billion in the governor’s plan. He calls in the Budget Plan for Growth. Both increase education spending.

Knecht noted that relative to the economy, state revenues have grown 19 percent since 2008. “Our conclusion is: The state of Nevada has a spending problem, not a revenue problem,” he said.

The bulk of Knecht’s increases in revenue for the next biennium — $744 million — would come from requiring local governments to calculate what they would save if public employees paid more into their retirement system — 7 percent for most and more than 10 percent for public safety workers. Then the local governments would write a check to the state for that amount.

Knecht said this will move the local public employees toward parity with state employees, who contribute twice as much of their salaries toward retirement. It also could amount to big cuts in salaries if local governments can’t find other funds to cover that $744 million. The controller said the legislative lawyers say this is not a tax and would not need a two-thirds vote.

Knecht’s plan is not even in bill form, and the governor’s revision need to be written up in bill form.

The Budget Plan for Growth has the advantage of taking less of a bite out of the private sector, thus allowing economic growth, which would result in higher revenue generation for the state.

How many special sessions will it take to pass a budget?

Here are key points in the BPfG proposal.

Here are key points in the BPfG proposal. The Economic Forum cut the estimated revenue because of all the tax abatements the governor was handing out to billionaires like Elon Musk and his Tesla battery plant.

This is how BPfG brings in revenue.

This is how BPfG brings in revenue.

This graph shows the inequity between private sector pay and local government pay.

This graph shows the inequity between private sector pay and local government pay.

This graph compares Knecht spending projections to Sandoval's.

This graph compares Knecht spending projections to Sandoval’s.

The PowerPoint: BPfG Taxation Committee Presentation 14May15

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

2 comments on “Controller offers plan to spend more without raising taxes … sort of

  1. Athos says:

    Sandoval has been one disappointment after another. Leader? Don’t make me laugh!!

  2. Anonymous says:

    Sandoval’s support of Kenny Guinn’s tax increase foretold the depth of his commitment to limited government and the rule of law. His expansion of Medicaid and the establishment of a state exchange left no doubt as to his ideology. His budget was predictable. It should be crystal clear that the distinctions between the Dems and Reps are few and inconsequential at both the State and National levels. Both parties seek to perpetuate their own power at the expense of our country and our freedom. This was a very sad Memorial Day for me. I am very thankful that my Dad is not alive to see the betrayal that is taking place.

    What I can’t understand is why the casino industry would be in favor of a gross receipts tax? Any one have a clue? I understand their support for illegal immigration, but supporting a gross receipts tax seems counter productive. Don’t they understand economics?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s