One branch of state Legislature passes bill demanding feds relinquish land

One house of a certain state Legislature, dominated by Republicans, has passed a bill ordering the federal government to hand over most federal public land in the state, even though their own lawyers advised them the bill was unconstitutional.

The bill is a follow up to a measure approved by the voters years ago to start process for grabbing federal land, but on which state officials have failed to follow up.

No, not Nevada, that’ll never happen, Alaska.

The bill passed by the House of the Alaska Legislature sounds very much like Michele Fiore’s Assembly Bill 408, which also demands the feds hand over land to the state. It will probably killed this week because it lacks the support of even some of its sponsors, who upon a thorough reading say its sections requiring continued beneficial use of land and water rights might jeopardize rather than protect existing rights.

The Alaska bill was by House Speaker Mike Chenault, a Republican. Chenault says the federal government has yet to transfer about 5 million acres of the land promised Alaska under the Alaska Statehood Act in 1958.

“I believe there is a breach of contract as well as a breach of good faith,” Chenault said. His bill lays claim to about 166 million acres.

According to the Alaska Dispatch News, the bill is similar to state law passed 1982 by a voter initiative called the Tundra Rebellion, similar to the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s, which resulted in Nevada voters’ in 1996 passing an initiative to take over federal land. State officials, Congress and courts have all ignored both of these votes of the citizens.

In 1983, the Alaska attorney general opined that “no good faith argument could be made to support” the claim that the state owned almost all the federal land within its borders.

The Legislative Counsel Bureau said of AB408 that “it appears well-settled that the United States has been judicially declared to be the owner of the unappropriated public lands in this State and, as such, has the authority to manage and control those public lands. Furthermore, it also appears well-settled that Nevada’s current statutory claim of ownership over those public lands … is unconstitutional and fails as a matter of law.”

Yes, that is what case law says. But case law has and can be reversed when better arguments prevail.

Utah lawmakers passed a bill that demanded all federal land be handed over to the state by the end of 2014. It has been ignored

The citizens of the West get that lot.

Michele Fiore testifies about AB408 before a legislative committee. (Video screen grab)

One comment on “One branch of state Legislature passes bill demanding feds relinquish land

  1. Patrick says:

    The land at issue has never belonged, individually, to any citizen of the West. And unless individual landowning citizens of the west, want me, to demand that they give their individually owned land, to me, upon my demand, they had better be careful about doing that with regard to land that they don’t own.

    And I must say, it’s particularly odd, that most of the people currently arguing that we the people ought to be forced to give up our land, upon demand, identify themselves as believers in property rights; the position is hypocritical to their otherwise professed belief in the sanctity of such rights.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s