Wouldn’t a new and improved bill of rights be glorious?

 Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.

Thomas Jefferson

The president has taken upon himself so much authority never envisioned by the Constitution that perhaps it is time for a renewed Bill of Rights to set things straight with this guy.

Something like this resolution:

Whereas, the president, by the assistance of divers evil counselors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavor to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of this nation;

By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Congress;

By committing and prosecuting divers worthy conservative groups for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power under the income tax laws;

By levying money for and to the use of the executive by pretense of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Congress;

By prosecutions by the IRS for matters and causes cognizable only in Congress, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;

And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served in high office;

And excessive fines have been imposed on financial institutions and businesses;

All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this nation;

Therefore, the people of this nation do (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) set out to assert their ancient rights and liberties and declare:

That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by presidential authority without consent of Congress is illegal;

That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by presidential authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;

That levying money for or to the use of the executive by pretense of prerogative, without grant of Congress, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;

That it is the right of the people to petition the government, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal, such as IRS scrutiny;

That the people may have arms and ammunition for their defense suitable to their conditions;

That the freedom of speech and debates ought not to be impeached or questioned;

That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, such as asset forfeiture, are illegal and void;

And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Congress holds the power, not the president.

What? You say it has been done already? In 1689? After the Glorious Revolution?

File this under: The more things change, the more they stay the same.

8 comments on “Wouldn’t a new and improved bill of rights be glorious?

  1. Bruce Feher says:

    Some one please tell the “man” in the White House that in America the people are the sovereign!

  2. nyp says:

    Actually, the 1689 Bill of Rights did not say that “the people” should have firearms. Instead, it said: “That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law

  3. Patrick says:

    “Subjects”? Funny word for sovereign.

  4. Winston Smith says:

    You mean normal, everyday people occasionally get sick and f’ing tired of being pushed around by their “bettors” and decide it’s time to do something about it, no matter the cost?

    Wow, what a concept.

    Of course, there are some that will tell you that freedom and liberty don’t really matter. They’re called assholes.

  5. Not ever gonna happen since Obama and other neo-socialists are taking over America rapidly. Sadly, many GOP’ers are willing accomplices in the process.

  6. Athos says:

    Impeach this punk!

  7. Athos says:

    Wasn’t it refreshing to hear a real leader speak in Congress on Tuesday? Too bad he can’t be temporary Speaker of the House!

    And it’s equally too bad our leaders can’t see the threat of illegal immigrants is just as dire to our nation’s security!

    Heck and Hardy voted to fund the DHS bill!!! OH THE SHAME!

  8. Winston Smith says:

    It’s not that our leaders can’t see, it’s that they don’t care.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s