Local governments could save millions if freed from collective bargaining restrictions

One of the biggest costs at just about every level of local government across the state of Nevada is personnel. Over the years our lawmakers have made it difficult to control those costs by making public employee union collective bargaining practically a mandate.

Ending public employee unions entirely would be our first option, but short of that there are several steps that could be taken in the upcoming session of the Nevada Legislature.

First, end binding arbitration. Under current law the local elected officials make a union contract offer and the union makes its own demands. If the two sides reach an impasse, which is too often the case in this post-recession, tight-money period, some out-of-state paid arbitrator who has never paid a dime in Nevada taxes and never will be affected by his or her decision decides which of the two final offers to impose.

The arbitrator is not allowed to compromise between the two positions and frequently sides with higher union wage demands simply because the city or county or school district can “afford” it, whether it is fair and competitive with the private sector or not.

Eliminating binding arbitration could save taxpayers millions of dollars.

Second, make the process transparent. Nevada Revised Statute 288 specifically states union negotiations or even informal discussions do not have to be open to the public. So they never are.

This means that the voters and taxpayers are left entirely in the dark and have no inkling as to whether their representative is fighting for their hard-earned money or rolling over for a belly scratch by public union officials who can provide cash and manpower come re-election time.

Private employers have the threat of being able to close up shop and go out of business. Public employers have no such option with which to bargain

Such negotiations should open to the public under open meetings laws every step of the way, right down to the final public vote.

Lawmakers could cut and paste language from the American Legislative Exchange Council’s model bill on this topic:

“Labor negotiations between government and government employees are an extension of the people’s business. … Since those negotiations deal with the public employer and public employees, taxpayers have a vested interest in the proceedings. … Taxpayers deserve to observe, monitor, and even participate in the processes by which public contracts are negotiated and awarded.”

Third, public employee unions should collect their dues from their members and not have the government go to the trouble and expense of cutting a check to the unions for members’ dues. This makes the cost of union membership more obvious for the workers.

Finally, the public employees should be required periodically to vote on which union, if any, is to represent them in collective bargaining. Perhaps more than a few public employees would rather stand on their own merits and compete for pay and benefits rather than settle for the same pay as union-protected laggards.

None other than the icon of progressivism, Franklin D. Roosevelt, pointed out in a 1937 letter the problem with collective bargaining for public employees:

“All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people …”

We demand our lawmakers put each of these suggestions to a vote, especially ending public employee unions entirely, so the voters can see who is really representing them come next Election Day.

9 comments on “Local governments could save millions if freed from collective bargaining restrictions

  1. Athos says:

    It’s really the only sane fiscal thing to do. How did Detroit pensions make out?

  2. Robert Frank says:

    Dear Thomas,

    Your latest about changing NRS concerning collective bargaining for government workers is among your finest articles in recent times. It could become a classic.

    No doubt you have written on this topic before. Who will submit the Bill Draft for these ideas? Obviously, both legislative sponsors and citizens groups will have to carry the burdens of such major changes in policies.

    If you need a citizen sponsorship group to assist, would you like our Citizen Task Force for Voter Rights to consider helping in this regard? We have a board meeting coming up in the near future where this matter could be discussed. This topic might easily fit within the current legislative work by CTF on election and HOA statute revisions to better serve our NV citizens. See the attached working draft point papers on those two topics.

    In addition, I believe Attorney, Dist. 9 Assemblyman David Gardner could become one of your strongest potential candidates for sponsoring a BDR through the system. He is young and not well known; but, I personally have come to know him to be extremely well-prepared mentally, intellectually, and morally to do what he was elected to do by honorably representing the best interests of all NV citizens.

    I can safely predict Assemblyman David Gardner would be the kind of courageous member and/or leader needed to participate in a special caucus to champion this policy change. I have discovered he appears to have the rare character and energy needed to help lead the NV efforts to reach out to voters of all ages and the skills needed to draft the kind of legislation for gaining the broad bipartisan support for the future of this state.

    If you do not yet know David, I would consider it an honor to arrange a meeting between you two to get acquainted discuss the matter. If you already have a Legislative member to sponsor your proposals, please advise how our CTF might be of assistance?

    Bob *Robert Frank, Colonel, USAF (Ret.), Chair, Citizen Task Force for Voter Rights* http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-e-frank-colonel-usaf-ret/16/9a5/955

    **

  3. nyp says:

    Remember when President Obama’s policies were going to create massive, crippling inflation?
    Whatever happened with that?

  4. Steve says:

    The price of oil collapsed worldwide, nyp!

    In fact NOW would be a great time for you guys to raise taxes on gasoline!

    Oh wait…you were voted out.

  5. nyp says:

    Actually, most economists agree now would indeed be an excellent time to pay for rebuilding our roads and bridges by increasing the gas tax by a small amount.

  6. nyp says:

    BTW, inflation in areas outside of oil/gas has been been similary non-existent.

  7. Steve says:

    Everything is effected by energy prices. It is a total fallacy to claim any “areas outside oil and gas” exist.

  8. nyp says:

    But I thought President Obama was waging war on energy exploration in the United States? And weren’t the Federal Reserve’s policies were going to turn us into Weimar Germany with a bit of Greece thrown in?

  9. Steve says:

    Yeah, imagine how much lower the price of oil would be if Obama wasn’t fighting it so hard!

    We had that discussion. The worlds reserve currency gets to play games that cost others,,,like stagflation turned recession as a direct result of Japan trying to copy our the QE the US FED has been able to get away with. Not that I am complaining, my stocks and 401 have benefited from it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s