Newspaper column: Why we should repeal the 17th Amendment

We managed to repeal the 18th Amendment, which created Prohibition. It is time to repeal the 17th.

What? You have no idea what the 17th Amendment is? Well, it is the one that effectively ended federalism by taking the power to appoint U.S. senators from state legislatures and having the citizens directly elect them, as they had always done with the House of Representatives.

We may not get better senators, but it is likely they would not try dictate to the states what they should do — as they did when they set the national speed limit at 55 mph and the drinking age at 21, under threat of losing highway funding. No Child Left Behind dictates education standards under threat of losing funding. The Motor Voter Law told states how to register voters, as recounted in this week’s newspaper column available online at The Ely Times and the Elko Daily Free Press.

ObamaCare threatened federal funding if states did not expand Medicaid and set up exchanges, until the Supreme Court decided that was too onerous.

James Madison said during debate over the Bill of Rights, “The state legislatures will jealously and closely watch the operations of Government, and be able to resist with more effect every assumption of power, than any other power on earth can do; and the greatest opponents to a Federal government admit the State Legislatures to be sure guardians of people’s liberty.”

There was a grand design to balance power, but that was broken in 1913 with the passage of the 17th Amendment.

George Mason warned when the Constitution was being drafted in Philadelphia that the Senate had to represent the states lest the federal government “swallow up the state legislatures.”

Mason argued to the delegation, “(W)e have agreed that the national Legislature shall have a negative on the State Legislatures — the Danger is that the national, will swallow up the State Legislatures — what will be a reasonable guard agt. this Danger, and operate in favor of the State authorities — The answer seems to me to be this, let the State Legislatures appoint the Senate …”

The delegates backed him unanimously.

Justice Antonin Scalia in 2010 at Texas Tech University Law School was asked what he would change about the Constitution.

“There’s very little that I would change,” he said. “I would change it back to what they wrote, in some respects. The 17th Amendment has changed things enormously.”

Scalia added, “We changed that in a burst of progressivism in 1913, and you can trace the decline of so-called states’ rights throughout the rest of the 20th century. So, don’t mess with the Constitution.”

That’s how we got FDR’s New Deal.

Then there is the argument put forward by Nevada’s own Jay Bybee, former William Boyd Law School constitutional law professor at UNLV and now judge on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the recommendation of Nevada’s senior senator, Harry Reid.

In 1997 Bybee penned an article for the Northwestern University Law Review titled “Ulysses at the Mast: Democracy, Federalism, and the Siren’s Song.” In Greek mythology, beautiful sirens lured sailors with their music and voices to shipwreck on the rocky coast of their island.

Bybee wrote of the passage of the 17th Amendment with a rhetorical flourish:

“Mason wished to provide some mechanism for states to defend themselves against ‘encroachment’ by a national government that everyone recognized would have significantly more power than any American sovereign since July 3, 1776. A senate appointed by state legislatures would be a near-complete defense to national encroachment because the senate controlled one-half of Congress. …

Sirens

“The Senate’s slide to popular democracy unyoked states and the national government in a way that has left the states nearly powerless to defend their position as other legitimate representatives of the people. As the United States moved into the Twentieth Century, it was inevitable that Congress would aggressively exercise power over matters such as commerce and spending for the general welfare in ways that no constitutional prophet would have foreseen. The lack of foresight of the circumstances under which Congress would exercise its powers did not excuse our failure to maintain those constitutional structures that assure the tempered, essential use of such powers. When we loosed ourselves from the mast to answer the Sirens’ call, we unleashed consequences only Circe could have foreseen.”

If the state Legislature of Nevada appointed the state’s two senators, do you think Reid would be calling them cowards for not voting to outlaw brothels in rural counties as he demanded in a speech at the Legislature in 2011?

The audacity of such power.

15 comments on “Newspaper column: Why we should repeal the 17th Amendment

  1. nyp says:

    Thank you for articulating the often-unarticulated Republican position that the power to elect Senators should be taken away from the people of the United States.

    By the way – if you don’t like the way your Senator is voting on legislation, why don’t you vote him out of office?

  2. You don’t believe in the wisdom of the Founders’ checks and balances?

  3. e. mitchell says:

    So how do we move forward repealing the 17th Amendment?

  4. Otter: I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part!
    Bluto: We’re just the guys to do it.

  5. Winston Smith says:

    I still miss Belushi. John, that is…

    1913: Year of the Triple Whammy on the United States

    Oh petey, it’s not like Tom revealed some new, shocking concept. One of differences between a pure democracy and a republic is indirect elections, like the U.S. Senate used to be and the Elector College still is. Don’t be a putz.

  6. nyp says:

    Yeah, that was a really great movie. “Knowledge is good.”

  7. Bill says:

    Good comment. Most people don’t even know about the 17th Amendment.

  8. Steve says:

    Turns out that second amendment moment, the shooter is a part time “official with a badge”

    This makes it all ok, expect the main line media to pick it up highlighting the badge almost to the point the guy becomes a virtual full time sheriff!

    sarcasm @ hypocrisy

  9. Athos says:

    Call a Constitutional Convention and get 3 at once. 16th, 17th, and the 26th. Add a term limits amendment to all elected federal offices and I think our work would be done!

  10. Just don’t mention the 19th, that’ll get you in a heap of hot water.

  11. Rincon says:

    Web have a good model of what our country would be like if we stripped much of the federal power. It’s the European Union.

  12. Athos says:

    Not even close, Rinny. Total fiction (but a nice retort!)

    But I do see, with all the Spanish being spoken in the West, how you could reach this erroneous proposition.

  13. […] Perhaps, instead, we should repeal the 17th Amendment. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s