Newspaper column: Supreme Court tells Nevada judges to butt out of campaigns

A Supreme Court opinion from earlier this summer should send a message to Nevada judges to butt out of election campaigns.

The court reversed and remanded a case out of Ohio that involved a law making it a crime for any person to “[p]ost, publish, circulate, distribute, or otherwise disseminate a false statement concerning a candidate, either knowing the same to be false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not” during the course of a political campaign, as reported in this week’s newspaper column, available online at The Ely Times, the Elko Daily Free Press and Mesquite Local News.u

Just weeks earlier a Nevada judge forced a state Senate candidate in the Republican primary to stop running a television commercial saying his opponent was a supporter of Harry Reid.

The judge wrote, “Ben Kieckhefer is likely to suffer irreparable injury to his career and reputation from defendant’s television advertisements.” Being associated with our senior U.S. senator can do that.

In the Ohio case, a group called the Susan B. Anthony List attempted to erect a billboard during the 2010 election season criticizing Rep. Steve Driehaus for voting for ObamaCare and thus supporting taxpayer-funded abortion. Driehaus got the Ohio Elections Commission to threaten the billboard company and the billboard was never posted.

Susan B. Anthony List sued, saying the law abridged its First Amendment rights.

Considering ObamaCare dictates the coverage of abortifacients, the statement about tax-payer funded abortion might well be considered true by many.

Just as Nevada state Senate Republican primary candidate Gary Schmidt’s claims about opponent Ben Kieckhefer were not proven untrue merely by the absence of Kieckhefer’s name on a list of Republicans for Reid. No one has found any evidence he supported Reid’s opponent. Kieckhefer at the time also told a newspaper reporter he intended to support Reid backer Bill Raggio’s bid to retain a Republican leadership position even though Raggio had openly supported Democrat Reid over Republican Sharron Angle.

Truth in an election campaign is not something for a commission or a judge to decide. That is for the voters to determine.

Justice Clarence Thomas noted in the Susan B. Anthony opinion, “The burdens that Commission proceedings can impose on electoral speech are of particular concern here. As the Ohio Attorney General himself notes, the ‘practical effect’ of the Ohio false statement scheme is ‘to permit a private complainant … to gain a campaign advantage without ever having to prove the falsity of a statement.’”

There is no requirement in the Constitution that people must defend their speech. It is up to others to reply with equal measures of free speech and win in the court of public opinion, not the courts.

Read the entire column at Ely, Elko or Mesquite.

Ohio tried to bar bill board

9 comments on “Newspaper column: Supreme Court tells Nevada judges to butt out of campaigns

  1. Rincon says:

    Maybe you guys are smarter than me, but for me, when everybody is lying, it becomes very hard to identify truth.

  2. nyp10025 says:

    ObamaCare does not “dictate the coverage of abortifacients.”

  3. Steve says:

    SCOTUS would appear to disagree with you on that.

  4. Boyd says:

    The SC decision seems right. It’s one thing for the judicial system to decide guilt in a defamation suit. It quite another to restrain speech you are not even a party to. The courts use standing to stop legal action all the time. Except for themselves I guess.

  5. Boyd says:

    Does anyone really believe Dems are referring to well baby care when they speak of reproductive rights? But that’s what they can claim if you challenge them. Always an out. Always an angle. Always on the attack. Always a new and crafty way to work the system to muzzle and/or confuse the issue. It’s all chaos and smoke screens all the time. It’s as evil as it is masterful and it needs to be recognized and crushed at every opportunity.

  6. Nyp says:

    Something tells me you don’t have any ladyparts

  7. Boyd says:

    Something tells me Mitchell didn’t take my advice and ban your manipulative trolling nonsense off his comment section. The utter destruction of Progressivism is all that counts at this point. Giving Progs any voice in a comment section that could be sharing ideas in pursuit of that goal is a mistake. I’m entirely unsympathetic to the idea Conservatives have some obligation to politely debate the nyps who play the, “what about this, explain it to me some more” game to capture discussion in endless circles of tit-for-tat diversions. To see comments done right visit the Belmont Club for a taste of how Conservatives can share and develop ideas to help crush the evil of Progressivism once and for all. All done with zero time wasted debating a heartless enemy about angels dancing on pins. Hope that’s clear.

  8. nyp says:

    How very Leninist of you.

    Comrades, we shall crush the Progressives as a class!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s