Feds target the rest of Nevada for sage grouse protection

Sage grouse

The other shoe dropped on Nevada today.

A week ago the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to designate as threatened — under the terms of the Endangered Species Act — the bi-state greater sage grouse found along the northern California-Nevada border, supposedly a distinct population segment of about 5,000 remaining birds.

Today the Bureau of Land Management posted on the Federal Register its land use plan alternatives to protect sage grouse in 16 counties in Nevada — it appears to exclude only Clark County — and northeastern California. There are separate notices covering sage grouse habitat in other Western states. Links to the planning strategy are available here.

The public now has 90 days to comment.

There are six alternatives:

— Alternative A: No action — continues current management direction under existing planning documents. This includes all 11 field offices involved in the planning effort, plus the Humboldt and Toiyabe National Forests.

— Alternative B: Focuses on priority habitat areas that have the highest conservation value to maintaining or increasing sage grouse. Could limit rights-of-way and fluid mineral leasing.

— Alternative C: Reduces or eliminates many of the uses on public lands, including livestock grazing.

— Alternative D: Is a sub-regional alternative that allows local adjustments to protections and allow some ongoing land uses.

— Alternative E: Is the Nevada governor’s alternative and looks at state-proposed conservation strategies.

— Alternative F: Would reduce mineral development and rights-of-way and other uses.

These alternatives cover more than 13 million acres.

This could lead to restrictions on mining, grazing, farming, fences, oil and gas exploration, roads, power lines, wind turbines and solar panels, various forms of recreation and more — costing jobs and economic development.

6 comments on “Feds target the rest of Nevada for sage grouse protection

  1. Wendy Ellis says:

    No oil and gas for Nevada. No mining, grazing, farming, fences, roads, or recreation. No sirree. We are the federal government, and we own Nevada! Prosperity is for states like North Dakota and Texas. Nevada, on the other hand, is destined to become a Potemkin clean energy village.

    Suck it up, Nevadans, and take one for Team Green.


  2. Solar panels as far as the eye can see. Will need to add a verse to “Home Means Nevada.”

  3. Vernon Clayson says:

    The BLM obviously works in a vacuum so I suppose Harry Reid had no say in this and it matters little if anything what Heller, Heck, Horsford, and Titus think, to say nothing of Governor Sandoval. Using freaking birds might seem to be an odd way for resources within a state to be nationalized, dictatorships usually don’t go to such measures but they have to start somewhere, why not the senate leader’s bailiwick?

  4. Athos says:

    Surprise, surprise, surprise! Good call Tom, but they don’t even care if we know what their game is.

    No wonder they want to eliminate the 2nd amendment.

  5. A Pahrump Valley Times reporter quotes a guy as saying the bi-state sage grouseactually had increases in population on the California side while numbers have been steady on the Nevada side.

  6. […] was the news from Friday that the Bureau of Land Management has opened the comment period for land use plans to […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s