Over the past couple of year’s I’ve offered up a few examples of Harry Reid’s antics and acrimony, flip-flops and angry outbursts, back-stabbing and just plain odd behavior.
On Sunday, former Review-Journal publisher Sherman Frederick launched his column on Reid with this rather — I thought — obvious but salient observation:
“When contemplating Harry Reid, it’s a mistake to attach extraordinary tactical meaning to his actions, or to give him the benefit of the doubt when he blurts out weird things.
“There is no deep side to Harry Reid. What you see is what you get. To understand the Senate majority leader the way longtime Nevadans do, one must quickly come to the realization that he’s got the grace and instincts of an outhouse rat.”
Harry Reid is no evil genius moving the Washington pawns like a chess-master, he is merely a human pinball bouncing from flipper to post, plowing down obstacles in his way. He is driven not by guile and cunning, but by whim and caprice.
That seems to be the theme of a piece in this week’s The Weekly Standard by Michael Warren titled “A Small Man in a Big Job: The petty reign of Harry Reid.”
Warren calls Reid “odd, temperamental, mercurial, obstinate, and rude,” a man who says things that “make you cringe.”
From there Warren provides a litany of anecdotes to support his description.
The magazine article notes that Reid not only is mean, crass and confrontational, he hires staffers who display similar traits — as this former editor can attest from the too frequent shouting matches over coverage of the senator from Searchlight.
Warren’s physical description of Reid includes: “His large hands, worn down by his years working in the Nevada mines as a young teenager, protrude awkwardly from his skinny suit jacket.”
Reid’s official biography mentions Reid as a small boy accompanying his father to the mines but fails to ever mention him actually working in the mines as a teenager. Perhaps.
Here are a few snippets from the article:
“Even his ostensible allies aren’t spared Reid’s nastiness. At a recent Capitol press conference with fellow Senate Democratic leaders, Reid joked about New York senator Chuck Schumer’s weight. Schumer was displaying a chart on a small piece of paper to the gathered members of the media. ‘I was told in second grade to hold it under your chin,’ Schumer said.
“’Chuck, you’re a lot older, though,’ Reid broke in. ‘Which chin?’”
——–
“In his six years as Democratic majority leader, Reid has done more institutional damage to the Senate than any leader in history. Under his leadership, particularly in the last two years, the Senate has seen some of its most unproductive periods ever. Appropriations bills for national defense, agriculture, and transportation take months, instead of weeks, to pass—but at least they pass. Most legislation is issued directly from the majority leader or his surrogates instead of from the committees, where the parties have to deal with each other. The result has been two years of fruitless debate over partisan bills with little to show for it. The Senate hasn’t passed a budget—one of its most basic functions—since April 29, 2009. But it has been Reid’s abuse of power that has been the most destructive element of his tenure.”
——–
“In the Reid regime, the Senate operates more or less at his whim. Members are frequently caught off guard when he decides to bring a bill up for debate. Reid will promise to allow a senator to present an important amendment only to change course at the last minute and claim he never made the promise at all. I asked Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn, a top political opponent of Reid who nevertheless speaks highly of the majority leader personally, to describe Reid’s leadership style. He paused, seemingly to think, before answering.
“’I’m not sure he has one,’ Coburn said.”
——-
“Reid can be curt to reporters, which may explain some of the reluctance from the press to ruffle his feathers. In 2009, a reporter asked him to clarify a statement he had made on the Senate floor. Reid told the reporter to ‘turn up your hearing aid.’
“’It was clear for those of us who understand English,’ Reid sniped.
Tell me again, all you Nevada liberal columnists, why Sharron Angle would have been an embarrassment.
The problem Tom is, the fools who vote for Harry don’t care. All they want is more free stuff paid for by suckers like you and me.
Yes, Bruce, plus the unions who launder dues through the Dem Party and back to pockets of union bosses.
That’s right. All the Nevada citizens who vote for Senator Reid are fools and free-loaders.
At last nyp gets it, “All the Nevada citizens who vote for Senator Reid are fools and free-loaders.” I would have said “fools or free-loaders, or both,” however.
Thomas, congratulations on the conversion!
Especially those “Republicans for Reid,” Petry.
Yup. That can be the Republican slogan in the next state-wide election:
“Did you vote for Harry Reid in the last election? Then you are a fool and a free-loader.”
A guaranteed vote-getter.
Washingtonian garrulous Harry has to run again in 2016 so we have to wait almost three years for him to be back with his genial neighbor act. That three years is plenty of time for him to select an opponent to carry out the pretense of a campaign. However, in that three years Harry and his fellow senators will have even less influence on national affairs than they do now as precedent has been set that the executive branch rules. Nevertheless, Harry’s slogan in 2016 will be “A vote for me is a vote for me”.
Worth reading:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/15/hitting-the-debt-ceiling-would-be-much-worse-than-a-government-shutdown/
Gpvernment shutdown wouldn’t affect government workers that serve the offices of the president, vice-president, the Congress and the courts, and there’s no mention of Homeland Security agencies, the Treasury, the IRS, etc. Obama doesn’t mean an actual government shutdown, he just threatens to withhold social security and military retiree pay, he didn’t mention food stamp recipients. Life will go on as it always does for the privilieged and welfare classes, he doesn’t care that the retired elderly will be inconvenienced, we didn’t vote for him.
And you NYP top the list!
list of what?
Ezra Klein/Paul Krugman. A difference which makes no difference is no difference.
What??
No decision IS a decision.
Huh?
President Obama, 07/13.2012: “We must ask for the wealthy to pay a little bit more.”
I congratulate Steve and all the others on this blog who just became “wealthy.”
Wherever you go, Nyp, there you are.
You should have written to your Republican senators and representatives to demand that they support President Obama in retaining the payroll tax holiday instituted in 2009 as part of his economic stimulus package
Huff, Nyps great freind, does not support Nyp.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/26/payroll-tax-cut-obama-administration_n_2194356.html
The Huffington Post reporter believes that the Obama Administration did into fight hard enough against the Republicans who sucessfully insisted that the 2009 Obama payroll tax holiday not be extended.
Steve believe that means that Obama and not the Republicans is to blame for the fact that payroll taxes have now returned to their George W. Bush levels.
I disagree.
“You should have written to your Republican senators and representatives to demand that they support President Obama in retaining the payroll tax holiday instituted in 2009 as part of his economic stimulus package.”
One of my senators is Harry Reid. I thought Mr. Searchlight Nevada Man of the People Independent Like Nevada Worked My Way Thru College My Mom Worked in the Laundry would be looking out for the best interests of the middle class.
Of course, I’m not an SEIU member…..
You should have written to Heller instead. Reid supported keeping the Obama payroll tax cut.
I don’t think either Obama or Reid ever said anything about payroll tax.
Discord in the liberal ranks, I love it. No wonder you guys couldn’t get the single payer you wanted.
I didn’t want single payor, but I did want a public option plan. Nevertheless, I’m more than willing to settle for ObamaCare, and I’m happy to see in 2014 and 2016 what the voters think of Republican promises to abolish it.
You have a time machine?
““We can’t allow that tax cut to expire. It would hit middle-class families with a tax increase at the worst possible time,” the president said Thursday. “And some of you may have heard — I said to folks yesterday, especially my good Republican friends, I said, you guys have made pledges never to raise taxes on everybody ever again — you can’t make an exception when the tax break is going to middle-class people.”
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/180781-conservatives-join-liberals-in-opposing-payroll-tax-cut#ixzz2IAOAgT00
Remember, this is the tax holiday that Paul Ryan opposed, and characterized as a “sugar high.” Can you guys name any Republican congressional leaders who pushed to have it extended this year?
Please Nyp, that was in 2011.
Right. A lifetime ago.
“You should have written to Heller instead. Reid supported keeping the Obama payroll tax cut.”
The Senate majority leader couldn’t get his way on a payroll tax reduction extension? Lyndon Johnson’s rolling in his grave.
In politics 6 months is a lifetime, Nyp.
He could in the Senate.
Last I heard, Harry Reid’s influence in the House of Representatives is quite limited. How about McConnell? Boehneer? Ryan? Where did they stand on extending the Obama payroll tax cut?
Same place as Pelosi and Obama stood.
So you are saying that Republicans and Democrats stood shoulder to shoulder in supporting the expiration of the Obama payroll tax cuts?
Harry the Crook is a much better nickname than Dirty Harry!
https://newsdeskinternational.wordpress.com/2013/01/12/indicted-businessman-names-harry-reid-as-alleged-recipient-of-massive-bribe/
Nyp finally sees “Screw The Middle Class” brings agreement to Washington City. At least the conservatives were not lying to our faces.
I will let you in on a little secret: I happen to approve letting the payroll tax go back up to GW Bush levels.
Since we’re in confessional here, I agree with Nyp on the issue of the Constitutionality of states seceding from the union.
I will also give Nyp credit for having a good sense of humor, sometimes intentional sometimes not.
Since we are in confessional here, I’ll own up that I’m personally very dubious about all the “green energy” projects that Mr. Mitchell complains about so much.
Many of them are probably a crock.
OK, I gotta admit- what is with these dudes from Hawaii?
I find myself also in agreement with Milty and Nyp on the constitutionality of states seceding. I even like the idea of paying the appropriate amount into Social Security, though I very much dislike the inclusion of those funds in the federal general fund.
In that spirit. Here you go.
Ryan was right.
But Obama may have talked about extending the payroll tax holiday, but he did nother.
According to the Sun Harry was back in Searchlight recently, there’s photos of him all smiling and happy about the mess government is in. Life is good if you are Harry Reid, not so much for the rest of us.
HArry Reid is :poop: